Dead language

Some limited decline

Lay use

  • Despite contrary socio-economic forces, it is vitally alive. For numbers, seethis thread.
  • Just search Youtube for Sanskrit videos - even omitting ancient hymns, you will find a lot.
  • “Sanskrit villages” -
    • mattUru 1.
  • Interesting account of sanskrit use from the perspective of western academics, with references: NLL.

Thriving literary scene and scholarship

  • 200-300 Mahakavyas composed in Sanskrit since independence. Total literary output is much more.
  • I myself am in regular contact - in person and electronically - with a quite a few sanskrit scholars of the very high caliber - even more if you consider second degree contacts.

Immortality by standardization

  • Immortality due to early and respected standardization by the grammarians.

As suhAsa says here:

“The Rāmāyaṇa is atleast 2500 years old. The hanumannāṭaka came more than 1500 years after it. And more than a millennium later came Rāma Śāstrī. And half a century later came Bacchu Subbarāyagupta. This literary chain may not seem unusual at first glance, yet it is an extraordinary thing to happen in a language. Languages come with lifetimes of less than a millennium.

Old English is as intelligible to me as Hebrew. Reading Geoffrey Chaucer is like wading through quicksand. Time will ensure libraries move Shakespeare from the literature section to history section.

But frozen in time by the spell of Pāṇini, only Classical Sanskrit will remain untouched. A few hundred years from now, a young boy (or girl), having taught himself Sanskrit, may decide to write a work to top Rāma Śāstrī. The poet to top Kālidasa may well be born a thousand years from now. My own descendants may spend a sunday afternoon, sipping soylent, and laughing at their ancestor’s metrical misadventures. How absurd it is to label such a language dead! Immortal is more like it.”