Consider a function class defined on the input space . Let be a probability measure on .
The definition of standard inner product and norms can be extended to work with function spaces, when they are regarded as vector spaces with dimensionality equal to ; while also considering the . These are described in the vector spaces survey.
One can define a metric space using the norm .
If is finite, we can simply use . If is not finite, we can consider the metric space defined using the ‘probability of disagreement’ metric. In this space, one can use covering and packing numbers to measure the size of . These concepts are described in the topology ref.
If is the boolean hypercube, we can use some other ways of measuring complexity of , these are described in the boolean functions survey.
For functions which satisfy Holder continuity generalized to sth derivative: (see topology ref): : C. \pf: Take ; \exclaim{now in input space, rather than in the function space!}; thence any covering of parameter space will define corresponding cover in the fn space.
Let . Take set of binary classifiers defined by supergraphs of g: see boolean fn ref; let be its VCD. Let be the packing number. . So, . \why