Definitions
For a fixed
Simply see the definition of min-cover integrals defined elsewhere: those form superior notions of integration than what follows.
Integral as least Upper sum, greatest lower sum
Aka Reimann Integral.
Partitions of [a,b]
Any such partition
Refinement
Upper, lower sums
Take bounded function \
Integrability
If
Limitations
Not Reimann integrable:
It is but a special case of superior notions such as the Stieltjes integral and the min-cover integral.
Min-cover integral of measurable functions
Aka Lebesgue integral, box integral. Take a real valued function
For
This can be extended to any function
Importance
It is superior to Reimann integral. The indicator function over rationals
Min-cover integral wrt to non decreasing g
Aka Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral or Radon integral.
This is defined as the min-cover integral obtained using a measure
Upper and lower sums view
Aka Stieltjes integral. Take
If
For
Advantages
Suppose
If
Series as Stieltjes integral
Derive g from unit step functions:
Importance
For a fixed
Basic properties
Integral sandwiched between L and U
If
Closeness to any sum between L and U
So, if
Continuity implies integrability
If
Proof
As
Relationship with Uniform convergence
Take
If
So, if
Continuity of semi-definite integral
If
Connection to derivative
Differential of integral over f
If
Proof
Continuity of f states that
Definite integral = difference in antiderivative
Anti-derivative
If
For any
Fundamental theorem of calculus
Proof
Pick a partition
Inter-measure Derivative
Aka Radon-Nikodym derivative. The min-cover integral may be used to define a derivative which connects two measures on the same measurable space: this is described in the chapter on measures in the Algebra survey.
Integration: evaluating definite integrals
Methods relevant (eg: transformation to polar coordinates) only for evaluating definite integrals of functions over product spaces are described elsewhere.
Also see section on important integrals for examples of application of these techniques.
Integration by parts
As definite integral equals the difference in the anti-derivative,
Thus, \(\int_{[a, b]} u dv = uv]{[a, b]} - \int{[a, b]} v du\) is a useful rule when RHS is easier to integrate.
Sum, product, decomposition rules
Due to definite integral being equal to difference in the antiderivative:
Transform the integral
Suppose you want to evaluate the definite integral I. Often, evaluating kI or
Change of variables
Function composition: integrability
If
\pf{Take
Hence, \(\forall \eta’ \exists P: U(P, j, g) - L(P, j, g) = \sum (M_{i}^{} - m_{i}^{}) \gD g_{i} = \eps (g(b) - g(a)) \leq \frac{\eta \eps}{\del} = \eta’\).}
So, if
Integration
Take strictly increasing onto
Then
\core{Take a partition
Utility
Change of variables is in general a extremely useful algebraic trick - so is this particular instance. Suppose
Reversing limits
By convention
Over product measure spaces
Consider
Let
Then, from the properties of the product measure: (Fubini)
Proof
Let
Thus, integration over the product measure space reduces to integrating over one variable at a time; and the order in which these integrals are taken does not matter in this case. This case is aka multiple integration.
Bounds
If
Use polar coordinates
Consider
As in the case of the Gaussian integral, the form
Important integrals
Normal integral
Aka Gaussian integral.
Proof
Importance
The Gaussian integral itself is important due to this nice integrability and the nice properties observed in the Gaussian distribution (very suitable for modeling). Further, it is useful because realated integrals can be used to smooth functions for various purposes (eg: optimization).
In calculating similar integrals, one often uses similar techniques and results about exponential and gamma probability densities.