आगमे विश्वासटिप्पन्यः

Original

अपृथग्वेदनात्पूर्वं तदत्र प्रतिपादितात् ।
ऐकरूप्यापरिज्ञानपर्यन्तेषु न सिद्धता ॥ २०६९ ॥

apṛthagvedanātpūrvaṃ tadatra pratipāditāt |
aikarūpyāparijñānaparyanteṣu na siddhatā || 2069 ||

Because the two are never cognised separately, as explained before,—therefore all the reasons adduced (by Kumārila); down to the ‘non-cognition of sameness’, should be rejected as ‘inadmissible’.—(2069)

Kamalaśīla

‘Because the two are never cognised separately’;—i.e. because the Blue and its Cognition are always found together; because for the man who has no apprehension of Cognition, there can be no perception of the Object;—all this has been explained before in course of the proof of Cognition being self-cognised;—where the non-difference between the Blue and its Cognition has been established;—because of this, all the Reasons adduced above (by Kumārila) down to the ‘non-cognition of sameness’ cannot be ‘admissible’.—(2069)