1131 Verse 1632

Original

उपमायाः प्रमाणत्वे विस्तरेण निराकृते ।
अर्थापत्तेस्तदुत्थाया वारितैव प्रमाणता ॥ १६३२ ॥

upamāyāḥ pramāṇatve vistareṇa nirākṛte |
arthāpattestadutthāyā vāritaiva pramāṇatā || 1632 ||

The validity of analogical cognition having been refitted in detail, the validity of presumption arising out of it becomes refuted as a matter of course.—(1632)

Kamalaśīla

It has been asserted (under Text 1599) that—“the presence, in the cow, which is likened to the Gavaya”, of the capacity to be apprehended by that cognition is cognised by Analogical Cognition”

This is refuted in the following—[see verse 1632 above]

Even granting the validity of Analogical Cognition, the Presumption based upon that cognition cannot be regarded as being a distinct Means or Form of Cognition, as it apprehends what is already apprehended; and also because there is no separate cognisable thing, in the shape of Potency, which could be cognised through it.

This is what is explained in the following—[see verses 1633-1634 next]