Oldenberg

p. 247

GRIHYA-SŪTRA OF ĀPASTAMBA.

p. 248 p. 249

INTRODUCTORY NOTE

TO THE

GRIHYA-SŪTRA OF ĀPASTAMBA.

The short treatise of Āpastamba on the Gr̥hya ritual forms one Prasna of the great corpus of the Āpastambīya-Kalpa-sūtra (see Sacred Books, vol. ii, p. xii) and stands, among the Gr̥hya texts, in closest connection with the Hiraṇyakesi-Gr̥hya-sūtra. The chief difference between these two Sūtras, both belonging to the Taittirīya School of the Black Yagur-veda, consists herein, that Āpastamba, just as has been stated above ¹ with regard to Gobhila, gives only the rules for the performance of the Gr̥hya rites without the Mantras, which are contained in a special collection, the Mantrapāṭḥa, standing by the side of the Sūtras: Hiraṇyakesin, on the other hand, follows the more usual practice, as adopted by Sāṅkhāyana, Āsvalāyana, Pāraskara, of interweaving the description of the ceremonies with the text of the corresponding Mantras. As to the relation in which the Āpastambīya-sūtras stand to the Mantrapāṭḥa, there is, so far as I can see, no reason why we should not extend the theory which we have tried to establish with regard to Gobhila, to the evidently parallel case of Āpastamba: the Sūtras presuppose the existence of the Mantrapāṭḥa, just as the latter text seems to presuppose the Sūtras. - The questions regarding the historical relation of Āpastamba to Hiraṇyakesin have been treated of by Professor Bühler in his Introduction to Āpastamba’s Dharma-sūtra, S.B.E., vol. ii, pp. xxiii seq.

I have here to thank Dr. Winternitz, to whom we are indebted for an excellent edition of the Āpastambīya-Gr̥hya-sūtra, for having placed at my disposal, before publication,

p. 250

the proof-sheets of his edition, and for lending me his copy of the Mantrapāṭḥa as well as of the commentary of Haradatta. The kindness of the same scholar has enabled me to make use of Professor Eggeling’s copy of the first part of Sudarsanārya’s commentary and of his own copy of the second part of the same work.