In this thesis, I have examined some derivational examples which have been previously discussed by prominent modern scholars such as Kiparsky (1982), Bronkhorst (2004) and Joshi and Kiparsky (2005). Below I give two tables of concordance.
- Kiparsky, P. (1982). The Ordering of Rules in Pāṇini’s Grammar. In Some Theoretical Problems in Pāṇini’s Grammar (pp. 77-120). Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
Note that:
C4 S3 E01 = Chapter 4, Section 4.3, Example 1
Example
Kiparsky’s example number
My example number
śvayitvā
01
C4 S3 E01
tad
02
C2 S7 E08
āghnīya
06
C4 S3 E33
hata
07
C4 S3 E02
vanitvā
08
C4 S3 E32
kramitva
09
C4 S3 E04
atikramya
10
C4 S3 E05
randhayati
14
C4 S3 E11
asmai
16
C2 S7 E12
śiṣṭāt
17
C4 S3 E09
aupyata
19
C4 S2 E04
dadhati
20
C4 S2 E02
pratīcaḥ
27
C3 S2 E01
seduṣaḥ
28
C3 S2 E02
prasthāya
30
C4 S3 E06
adhītya
55
C5 S2 E01
6.1.77, 6.1.101, 6.1.87
58
C2 S8 E03, E05
tarati
after Ex. 60, pp. 117-118.
C4 S4 E03
236
- Joshi, S.D., & Kiparsky, P. (2005). The Extended Siddha-Principle. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 86, 1-26.
and
Bronkhorst, J. (2004). From Pāṇini to Patañjali: The Search for Linearity. Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
(Bronkhorst frequently quotes an unpublished draft of Joshi and Kiparsky in his paper. I think this draft is the aforementioned paper that was published in 2005, after the publication of Bronkhorst’s paper in 2004. It is for this reason that I have mentioned both papers together here).
Example
Joshi & Kip. (Pg. no)
Bronkhorst (Pg. no.)
My thesis
kālimmanyā
-
12
C3 S2 E08
devaiḥ / vr̥kṣaiḥ
-
15
C2 S7 E01
dadhati
16-17
17
C4 S2 E02
gārgīyāḥ
-
18-19
C3 S2 E05
aupyata
13-14
20
C4 S2 E04
jatune / vāriṇe
-
33-34
C2 S8 E10
rājabhiḥ
2-3
-
C5 S2 E03
tad
5-6
-
C2 S7 E08
adhītya
9-10
-
C5 S2 E01
seduṣaḥ
11-12
-
C3 S2 E02
śvayitvā
15-16
-
C4 S3 E01
asmai
18-19
-
C2 S7 E12
237